<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Infomania.co.uk &#187; speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/tag/speed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infomania.co.uk</link>
	<description>Stuff you want to know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bluetooth 3.0 High Speed now official</title>
		<link>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/166</link>
		<comments>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/166#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infomania.co.uk/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bluetooth SIG (Special Interest Group) officially adopted the Bluetooth 3.0 HS specification today. Not that you would know it from the official Bluetooth.com and Bluetooth.org websites &#8211; neither appear to have any mention of it, apart from an almost fact-free blog entry.</p> <p>Intended to aid the transfer of large files such as video, audio and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bluetooth SIG (Special Interest Group) officially adopted the Bluetooth 3.0 HS specification today. Not that you would know it from the official Bluetooth.com and Bluetooth.org websites &#8211; neither appear to have any mention of it, apart from an almost fact-free blog entry.</p>
<p>Intended to aid the transfer of large files such as video, audio and high resolution digital photos, the new version supports speeds of up to 24Mbps. It does this by incorporating support for 802.11g to  enable Bluetooth over WiFi. The result should be a standard that delivers high data speeds and greater energy-efficiency.</p>
<p>Looking further into the future the next iteration of Bluetooth is likely to incorporate Ultra Wideband technology, which should boost data speeds to as much as 480 Mbps. Ideal for wirelessly delivering pictures that 72 inch glasses-free 3D display you will have in your living room by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/166/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory card speed ratings &#8211; what do they mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/114</link>
		<comments>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/114#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infomania.co.uk/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SD and CompactFlash memory cards often carry speed ratings but it isn&#8217;t clear what the numbers mean exactly. To make matters worse the two card formats use different methods of designating the speeds. Although many devices only take one card type what do you use if you have a camera or media player that will take either?</p> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SD and CompactFlash memory cards often carry speed ratings but it isn&#8217;t clear what the numbers mean exactly. To make matters worse the two card formats use different methods of designating the speeds. Although many devices only take one card type what do you use if you have a camera or media player that will take either?</p>
<p>SD card speed ratings are quite simple &#8211; the cards are rated into three different speed classes &#8211; class 2, class 4 and class 6. The numbers indicate the minimum transfer speed of each class in Megabytes per second:</p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px">Class 2  &#8211; minimum transfer speed 2 MBytes/sec<br />
Class 4  &#8211; minimum transfer speed 4 MBytes/sec<br />
Class 6  &#8211; minimum transfer speed 6 MBytes/sec</p>
<p>CompactFlash speed ratings are completely different. A few manufacturers have applied their own simplified labels, such as SanDisk&#8217;s Ultra 2, Extreme 3 and Extreme 4, but the majority of manufacturers use an &#8216;x&#8217; rating. You will find CompactFlash cards with speed ratings from 12x to 300x. It seems clear that 300x is faster than 12x (especially when you look at the prices) but what is the actual transfer speed?</p>
<p>It may seem odd but CompactFlash speed ratings are the number of times the card is faster than an old 1x speed CD-ROM. This is because CF cards use the same IDE interface as CD-ROMs and can be thought of as an alternative type of removable storage.</p>
<p>The speed of those original CD drives was 150 kBytes/sec or 0.15 Mbytes/sec, so a 12x card will support a transfer speed of 12 x0.15 = 1.8 Mbytes/sec. As you can see this appears to be comparable with a class 2 SD cards. Unfortunately some card manufacturers use maximum write speeds not minimum speeds, which may be significantly lower. Major brands are more honest with Lexar for example making it clear that their card ratings are minimum sustained write speeds.</p>
<p>Here is a table showing some common card ratings. You can clearly see why high-end digital cameras have continued using CompactFlash cards, as all but the slowest are faster than the fastest SD cards:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">12x = 1.8 Mbytes/sec<br />
40x = 6 Mbytes/sec<br />
80x = 12 Mbytes/sec<br />
100x = 15 Mbytes/sec<br />
200x = 30 Mbytes/sec<br />
266x = 40 Mbytes/sec<br />
300x = 45 Mbytes/sec</p>
<p>So there you have it &#8211; speed ratings for SD and CF cards explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/114/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

