<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Infomania.co.uk &#187; biometric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/tag/biometric/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infomania.co.uk</link>
	<description>Stuff you want to know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK government finally accepts it cannot secure large databases</title>
		<link>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/178</link>
		<comments>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/178#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[id]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infomania.co.uk/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a major climbdown the UK government has dumped plans for a massive communications database. To quote Jacqui Smith, Home Secretary, in the foreword to a government consultation on the subject, &#8221;the balance between privacy and security is a delicate one, which is why this consultation explicitly rules out the option of setting up a single [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a major climbdown the UK government has dumped plans for a massive communications database. To quote Jacqui Smith, Home Secretary, in the foreword to a government consultation on the subject, &#8221;the balance between privacy and security is a delicate one, which is why this consultation explicitly rules out the option of setting up a single store of information for use in relation to communications data.&#8221; Which is another way of saying the government has accepted that, after leaving everything but the PM&#8217;s washing list on a train somewhere, the safest government database is one that doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>All we need now is for them to accept that a biometric ID card/passport database, holding details on the entire population, can&#8217;t be protected either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infomania.co.uk/archives/178/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

